Skip to content

Commission 135560858State of TexasCommission ends 07/29/2030

I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN TEXAS AND MAY NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE OR ACCEPT FEES FOR LEGAL ADVICE.

Back to the list

How the Texas Notary Record Book was built

The Texas Notary Record Book started because my journal was living in someone else's software. I notarize in person and online. The platform changes. I have used ProNotary, then Notaron, then BlueNotary, then Proof. Each one can run the session. None of them owns the act. The act still has to go in my book, under my control, not theirs. When I leave a platform, a journal that lives inside that platform leaves with it. A paper book is still legal, and it is cheaper, and it goes silent when I need a copy years later. I wanted one book that stayed with me.

That was the beginning. It was not a product plan and it was not a company. It was the record I have to be able to produce for my own commission. I built the first working copy for that reason, and then I used it. Using it is what produced the changes.

I estimate about forty changes from that first working book to the one I use now. The count is the changes that altered what the book does: a field it asks for, a field it refuses, a key, a backup, a device, or a rule I had wrong. It does not include every sentence I rewrote. It does not include the screenshots. Those were replaced again after the behavior changed, because a picture that shows an old rule is worse than no picture. Forty is an estimate. I did not keep a public version number for every pass. The number is here because the passes were the work. A book that is usable is not the first shape I drew.

The first shape was the entry. The book had to ask for the traditional fields and the remote-online fields, in one journal, because I do both and I was not going to keep two books. It had to number every entry in order and never reuse a number. A void stays in the book. The next act takes the next number. It had to hold the record for ten years under Government Code § 406.014(g), and it had to show the date that retention runs to. It had to record the fee. It would not take an identification number, and it would not take a fingerprint. Those are details Government Code § 406.014 and 1 Texas Administrative Code § 87.50 do not allow in the journal. A generic national book leaves a column for them. Mine does not have the column.

A remote entry was its own change. The book asks for the platform, the session, and where the audio-visual recording is stored. The recording itself is not in the book. Government Code § 406.108 requires that recording. The journal is the written record. They are two different things, and an early draft did not keep them apart clearly enough. I separated them.

A certified copy was the next problem. The point of the book is that I can produce the record. I do not print the whole book because someone asked for one act. I print the entries that were asked for. I print the whole book only if the whole book was asked for. The names in the screens on this site are demonstration entries, not official acts.

Then I locked the working copy, and I got the lock wrong more than once. The working copy stays on my phone or my computer, locked with a passphrase. The passphrase stays on that device. A short sentence works. One dictionary word with a number on the end does not. That rule was added after a passphrase that looked long and was still easy to guess.

The recovery key came next, and it moved. It is shown once, when the book is created. I write it down and keep it with my commission, not in the journal. It is also on the lock screen, so the book can be opened if the passphrase is lost. An earlier pass hid the key after the first screen and left me with no way back except the paper I hoped I had kept. The lock screen is the correction.

Losing both was the pass after that. If I lose the passphrase and I also lose the key, I can still open the certified record and print the copy. The backup zip stays readable on purpose. I do not lock the zip. I had considered locking it, because a locked file sounds safer. A locked zip that I cannot open is not a record. I keep a second copy on a drive or in a folder only I can open, not in a shared inbox and not in a shared folder.

The recovery key and the passphrase are not the same secret, and I had to make the book say so. If I need a new recovery key, I generate it under Office, while the book is open. The old key then stops opening this book on this device. A backup I saved before that still opens with the old key. Changing the passphrase does not retire the recovery key. Those two sentences took more than one pass. The first behavior retired too much, or retired the wrong thing. A notary who changes a passphrase must not discover, years later, that the written key no longer opens anything.

The integrity log was added after I could already open the book. It is a check I keep, not a seal. If I still have an earlier copy, I can see that two files do not tell the same story. I can also delete the file. The book does not pretend otherwise. An early idea was to make the log sound like proof that nothing had been altered. That would have been a false promise. I took it out.

The license key was a separate problem from the journal lock. One key works on up to three devices. The key does not unlock the journal. The passphrase does that. When the three seats are full, the book does not push a device off. I see which devices are using the key, and I choose which one to release. The journal on that device is not deleted. An earlier behavior would have dropped a device for me. I rejected it. I am the one who decides which copy stays.

The offline rule was there from the start and it survived every later pass. After the first connection, the book opens with no signal. That matters when I am standing in a parking lot. A journal that needs a network at the moment of the act is another platform.

The phone was not a smaller website. It is the same book. I can start a traditional act or a remote online act from the phone, and I can keep a copy of the certified record there. The screens were rebuilt after these rules settled. Fourteen of them are on the screens page. They can still lag behind the book. The working copy is the current one.

I also decided what the book would not become. It is one payment, not a monthly rental. The license key does not expire. I thought about an annual maintenance charge, and I set it aside. Keeping up with who had paid, and who had not, would have been a second business. If the State adds a field, the field has to be there. I would add it whether or not anyone had paid a support fee. Other states are in development. Florida is next. Coming in 2027. That is a different book, not a change to this one.

About forty changes, by my estimate, stand between the first working book and the one I keep now. The ones that matter are the ones a notary hits on a bad day: a lost passphrase, a full set of devices, a backup that still opens, a number that is never reused, and a certified record that can still be printed. This note is that history. It is not legal advice, and it is not a promise that a later change will never be made.

This note is for a Texas notary. It is not legal advice. The record book is for sale on the For Fellow Notaries page.